Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology; March 2009; v. 57; no. 1; p. 81-104; DOI: 10.2113/gscpgbull.57.1.81
© 2009 Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists
This Article
Right arrow Résumé
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Azmy, K.
Right arrow Articles by Chi, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Origin of dolomites in the Boat Harbour Formation, St. George Group, in western Newfoundland, Canada: implications for porosity development

K. Azmy

Department of Earth Sciences, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL A1B 3X5, kazmy{at}mun.ca

I. Knight

Geological Survey of Newfoundland and Labrador, Department of Natural Resources, Government of Newfoundland and Labrador, P.O. Box 8700, St. John’s, NL A1B 4J6

D. Lavoie

Geological Survey of Canada, GSC-Q, Natural Resources Canada, 490 de la Couronne, Québec City, QC G1K 9A9

G. Chi

Department of Geology, University of Regina, Regina, SK S4S 0A2

The lower part of the St. George Group of western Newfoundland consists of Tremadocian shallow marine platform carbonates of the Boat Harbour (about 180 m thick) and the underlying Watts Bight (about 60 m thick) formations. In the Boat Harbour Formation, dolomitization is pervasive at the top of most shallowing-upward, metre-scale, peritidal hemicycles. Petrographic examination of the Boat Harbour Formation carbonates suggests that the succession has been affected by at least three phases of dolomitization, which influenced the final rock porosity. These phases have crystal-size ranges of about 4 to 40 µm (earliest dolomite D1), 50 to 150 µm (D2), and 300 µm to 20mm (saddle dolomite D3), respectively. They occur as both replacements and cements and exhibit dull (D1 and D3) to zoned (D2) luminescence under the cold cathodoluminoscope. The occurrence of near-micritic size dolomites (about 4–40 µm) may suggest that dolomitization started at low temperatures during early stages of diagenesis. The lack of evaporite interbeds in the formation and the depleted {delta}18O values (– 6.2±0.8{per thousand} VPDB) as well as the low Sr contents (168±45ppm) of the earliest dolomites likely exclude a brine origin from evaporated seawater. The Sr/Ca molar ratios (0.0069 to 0.0017), calculated for the earliest dolomitizing fluid, suggest a mixture of marine and meteoric waters possibly in a mixing zone environment. The petrographic features and geochemical attributes of D2 and D3 phases, such as their depleted {delta}18O values (– 6.9±1.5{per thousand} and – 8.3±0.9{per thousand} VPDB, respectively) and Sr contents (177±76 and 117±33ppm, respectively), suggest that they were formed under relatively deeper burial conditions and possibly from hydrothermal fluids which is supported by homogenization temperatures (up to 135° C) and estimates of salinities (up to 23 wt. % NaCl) in the latest dolomites (D3). Based on visual estimates from thin sections, the porosity varies from <1% in most of the formation to about 10% in a dolomitized algal lime mudstone bed in the upper part of the formation, a few metres below the Boat Harbour Disconformity. Except for some vugs, the majority of pores are intercrystalline and associated with D2.

The dolomitization events recorded by the Boat Harbour Formation carbonates resemble, in their succession and geochemical signatures, those previously documented in the Aguathuna Formation. However, significant differences are noted with the dolomitization events recorded in the Lower Ordovician Romaine Formation on Anticosti Island; these differences are tentatively associated with the very distinct tectonic settings of each case.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists