Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Résumé Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Coniglio, M. Articles by Carter, T. R. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Dolomitization and recrystallization of middle Silurian reefs and platformal carbonates of the Guelph Formation, Michigan Basin, southwestern Ontario

Department of Earth Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, coniglio{at}uwaterloo.ca

Qing Zheng

Leling Phoenix Brake Canada Inc., 100 Pinebush Road, Cambridge, ON N1R 8J8, cnczheng{at}aol.com

Terry R. Carter

Petroleum Resources Centre, Ministry of Natural Resources, 659 Exeter Road, London, ON N6E 1L3, terry.carter{at}mnr.gov.on.ca

Regional study of the Guelph Formation (middle Silurian) in the subsurface of southwestern Ontario highlights the role of recrystallization during burial diagenesis in producing massive dolomites with relatively uniform petrographic features but complicated geochemistry. The dolomite is composed mainly of replacive, unimodal to polymodal mosaics characterized by uniform, dull to weak red cathodoluminescence. Whereas patch reefs on the platform and most pinnacle reefs on the upper basin slope are pervasively dolomitized, reefs on more basinward parts of the slope may be partially dolomitized, usually in their lower portions, or they remain limestone. The lithology of overlying carbonates in the lower Salina Group mimics closely that of the underlying Guelph Formation. Initial shallow burial dolomitization occurred in the Late Silurian in response to isolation and hydrological drawdown of the Michigan Basin. The basinward-decreasing dolomite trend resulted from continuous seawater flux from the middle (back reef) platform downward through Guelph limestones to the discharge areas on the slope and beyond. Reefs at the distal end of the regional paleoflow system, or those that were poorly connected to the system remained limestone. Both dolomite ¹³C values, which range from +1.1 to +5.0 (PDB), and ⁸⁷Sr/⁸⁶Sr ratios, which range from 0.70845 to 0.70910, reflect a Silurian seawater source.

Values for ¹⁸O range from –5.2 to –9.7 (PDB) but cannot be explained by the above mechanism alone. Recrystallization likely occurred during the progressive burial of these rocks to depths of up to 2 km, and may at least in part explain the lack of correlation among dolomite crystal size, cathodoluminescence characteristics and the various geochemical parameters measured in this study. The reason for the wide spread in ¹⁸O values both geographically and stratigraphically reflects varying degrees of recrystallization as a function of macro- to micro-scale permeability and porosity differences in the precursor lithology and their control on fluid-rock interactions during recrystallization. The cause of the apparent decrease in dolomite ¹⁸O values from patch reefs on the platform (average ¹⁸O = ~ –6) to the lower slope (average ¹⁸O = ~ –8.5) is unknown, but may have resulted from a combination of a basinward increase in burial depth and a basinward increase in heat-flow, which are now only subtly preserved through the "noise" of multiple recrystallizations.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Q. Fu, H. Qing, and K. M. Bergman Early dolomitization and recrystallization of carbonate in an evaporite basin: the Middle Devonian Ratner laminite in southern Saskatchewan, Canada Journal of the Geological Society, December 1, 2006; 163(6): 937 - 948. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]