Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology; September 2001; v. 49; no. 3; p. 393-407; DOI: 10.2113/49.3.393
© 2001 Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists
This Article
Right arrow Résumé
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cioppa, M.T.
Right arrow Articles by Gillen, K.P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Facies and lithological controls on paleomagnetism: an example from the Rainbow South field, Alberta, Canada

M.T. Cioppa, J.S. Lonnee1, D.T.A. Symons and I.S. Al-Aasm

Department of Earth Sciences, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, N9B 3P4

K.P. Gillen

Vox Terrae International, Suite 1540, 521 - 3 Avenue SW, Calgary, AB, T2P 3T3

Correspondence: 1 Current address: Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E3

Paleomagnetic analysis of specimens from the Middle Devonian Sulphur Point Formation in four wells in the Rainbow South field, Alberta, Canada, showed magnetization that correlated with the different lithological fractions and facies observed within the wells. In limestone, the fine-grained mudstones contain a Late Devonian magnetization with the paleopole at 36.3°N, 99.4°E (dm = 6.3°, dp = 11.7°) while the coarser-grained grainstones and packstones contain a Tertiary or present-day magnetization with a paleopole at 81.2°N, 210.6°E (dm = 4.7°, dp = 4.5°). Of five previously identified dolomitic fractions or phases, three were isolated in sufficient quantity to allow standard paleomagnetic analysis and age determination: the fine-crystalline dolomite had a paleopole of 75.2°N, 143.0°E (dm = 12.1°, dp = 14.1°) in the Middle to Upper Jurassic; the medium-crystalline dolomite had a paleopole of 69.9°N, 190°E (dm = 10.5°, dp = 11.2°) in the Cretaceous; and the saddle dolomite paleopole at 74.9°N, 203.2°E (dm= 5.6°, dp = 5.8°) was of Paleocene or Eocene age. Insufficient samples of the earliest dolomitic phase, dolomicrite, were available for statistical analysis. However, the paleoinclination suggests a minimum age of Early Jurassic. Paleomagnetic dates thus confirm the relative order of dolomite formation as identified in previous studies.

The presence of the Paleocene–Eocene magnetization is one of the most significant findings in this study. This magnetization is present in specimens containing vug-filling, replacement or veined saddle dolomite, and is carried by magnetite. Thus, in the Rainbow South Field, the timing of saddle dolomite is unambiguous, and its precipitation must be due to the Laramide Orogeny.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
Dating penecontemporaneous dolomitization in carbonate reservoirs: Paleomagnetic, petrographic, and geochemical constraints
AAPG Bulletin, January 1, 2003; 87(1): 71 - 88.





JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists