Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology; September 2000; v. 48; no. 3; p. 262-283; DOI: 10.2113/48.3.262
© 2000 Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists
This Article
Right arrow Résumé
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lonnee, J.
Right arrow Articles by Al-Aasm, I. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Dolomitization and fluid evolution in the Middle Devonian Sulphur Point Formation, Rainbow South Field, Alberta: petrographic and geochemical evidence

Jeff Lonnee1 and Ihsan S. Al-Aasm

Department of Earth Sciences, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, N9B 3P4

Petrographic and geochemical studies of the Middle Devonian (Givetian) Sulphur Point Formation in the vicinity of the Rainbow South Field, northwestern Alberta, reveal that dolomitization was a direct result of precipitation by chemically distinct fluids, and that recrystallization of these dolomites significantly altered their original chemical signatures. Sulphur Point carbonates were deposited in a restricted peritidal environment. Lithofacies include grainstones, sparsely fossiliferous packstones, mudstones, algal mudstones, and intraclast breccia mudstones. Multiple episodes of calcite cementation and dolomitization have affected these rocks to varying degrees. Five dolomite types were identified: 1) dolomicrite, 2) fine-crystalline matrix dolomite, 3) medium-crystalline matrix dolomite, 4) saddle dolomite and 5) fracture-lining dolomite.

Dolomicrite (2–20 µm) replaced both micrite and calcite cement in the mud-supported facies before early compaction. A trend toward more negative {delta}18O values of –9.22 to –3.10{per thousand} Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite (VPDB) with respect to postulated Middle Devonian marine carbonate values suggests that dolomicrite was recrystallized by later fluids. Geochemical modelling of the isotope and trace element trends in the dolomicrite support this interpretation.

Both fine- and medium-crystalline matrix dolomites (40–200 µm) are usually fabric destructive. However, some intervals have retained lamination and algal structures. Matrix dolomite was formed during intermediate burial, as suggested by its association with dissolution seams, high Fe and Mn concentrations, and {delta}18O values of –12.20 to –8.34{per thousand} VPDB. This evidence, in addition to the presence of high salinity fluid inclusions (~ 18 wt% NaCl equivalent), indicates that matrix dolomite was precipitated by basinal fluids between the Mississippian and Late Jurassic.

The precipitation of saddle dolomite (0.5–2.0 mm) is genetically related to fractures and breccia zones where it partially to completely occludes the fractures, breccias and vugs that were developed through the dissolution of the earlier matrix dolomites. Geochemical and petrographic evidence suggests that saddle dolomite was precipitated from a hot, slightly saline (10.5 to 13.3 wt% NaCl equivalent), calcium-rich fluid that was funnelled upward along faults and fractures that developed during the Late Cretaceous to early Tertiary Laramide Orogeny. Strontium isotope modelling confirms that saddle dolomite was precipitated from a two-component hydrothermal fluid incorporating a significant quantity of Middle Devonian brines and radiogenic basement fluids.

Fracture-lining dolomite (0.2–1.0 mm) was the last dolomite phase to precipitate, and is intimately associated with blocky calcite, quartz, sulphide mineralization and pyrobitumen. Isotopic and fluid inclusion evidence imply precipitation from slightly saline brines (~ 8 wt% NaCl equivalent) at elevated temperatures. Extremely low Fe and Mn concentrations, negative {delta}13C values (~ –5{per thousand} VPDB), and significant volumes of H2S gas suggest that fracture-lining dolomite was precipitated from syn- to post-Laramide fluids during thermochemical sulphate reduction.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
The Gas-Bearing Devonian Presqu'ile Dolomite of the Cordova Embayment Region of British Columbia, Canada: Dolomitization and the Stratigraphic Template
AAPG Bulletin, September 1, 2002; 86(9): 1609 - 1638.



Home page
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum GeologyHome page
M.T. Cioppa, J.S. Lonnee, D.T.A. Symons, I.S. Al-Aasm, and K.P. Gillen
Facies and lithological controls on paleomagnetism: an example from the Rainbow South field, Alberta, Canada
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, September 1, 2001; 49(3): 393 - 407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum GeologyHome page
K. G. Root and K. G. Root
Devonian Antler fold and thrust belt and foreland basin development in the southern Canadian Cordillera: implications for the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, March 1, 2001; 49(1): 7 - 36.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists