Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology; December 1997; v. 45; no. 4; p. 474-505
This Article
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Order Hardcopy of Full Text via AGI/GeoRef
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davies, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Sherwin, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

The Lower Triassic Montney Formation, west-central Alberta

Graham R. Davies, Thomas F. Moslow, and Mike D. Sherwin

Graham David Geological Consultants, Calgary, AB, Canada
Ulster Petroleums, Canada
Sherwin Geological Consulting, Canada

The Lower Triassic Montney Formation was deposited in a west-facing, arcuate extensional basin, designated the Peace River Basin, on the northwestern margin of the Supercontinent Pangea, centred at about 30 degrees N paleolatitude. At least seasonally arid climatic conditions, dominance of northeast trade winds, minimum fluvial influx, offshore coastal upwelling, and north to south longshore sediment transport affected Montney sedimentation. Paleostructure, particularly highs over underlying Upper Devonian Leduc reefs and lows associated with graben trends in the Peace River area, strongly influenced Montney depositional and downslope mass-wasting processes. A wide range of depositional environments in the Montney is recorded by facies ranging from mid to upper shoreface sandstones, to middle and lower shoreface HCS sandstones and coarse siltstones, to finely laminated lower shoreface sand and offshore siltstones, and to turbidites. Dolomitized coquinal facies occur at seven stratigraphic horizons in the Montney. Some coquinas are capped by karst breccias and coarse-grained aeolian deflation lag sand residues indicating subaerial exposure. The Montney has been divided into three informal members that have been dated by palynology and compared with global Early Triassic sequences. The subdivisions are: the Lower member, of Griesbachian to Dienerian age, correlated with a third-order cycle; the Coquinal Dolomite Middle member, of mixed Dienerian and Smithian ages; and the Upper member, of Smithian to Spathian age, correlative with two, shorter-duration third-order cycles. A forced regressive wedge systems tract model is adopted for deposition of the Coquinal Dolomite Middle member and for turbidites in the Valhalla-La Glace area of west-central Alberta. With this model, coquinas and turbidites accumulated during falling base level to lowstand, with a basal surface of forced regression at the base of the coquina and a sequence boundary at the top of the coquinal member. This is supported by the evidence for subaerial exposure and maximum lowstand at the top of the coquina. Very limited grain size distribution in the Montney, dominantly siltstone to very fine-grained sandstone, but often very well sorted, is interpreted to reflect an aeolian influence on sediment source and transport. High detrital feldspar and detrital dolomite in the Montney are consistent with (but not proof of) aeolian source from an arid interior, as is high detrital mica content in finer size grades. Extensive and often pervasive dolomitization, and early anhydrite cementation within the Montney, are also consistent with an arid climatic imprint. As new exploratory drilling continues to reveal the wide range of facies in the Montney, it adds to both the complexity and potential of this relatively unique formation in western Canada.

This record provided courtesy of AGI/GeoRef.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum GeologyHome page
J. Dixon
A major unconformity at the base of the Upper Triassic Charlie Lake Formation in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, December 1, 2005; 53(4): 432 - 453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PALAIOSHome page
L. A. BUATOIS, M. K. GINGRAS, J. MACEACHERN, M. G. MANGANO, J.-P. ZONNEVELD, S. G. PEMBERTON, R. G. NETTO, and A. MARTIN
Colonization of Brackish-Water Systems through Time: Evidence from the Trace-Fossil Record
Palaios, August 1, 2005; 20(4): 321 - 347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Sedimentary ResearchHome page
G.J. Retallack
Earliest Triassic Claystone Breccias and Soil-Erosion Crisis
Journal of Sedimentary Research, July 1, 2005; 75(4): 679 - 695.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum GeologyHome page
J. Dixon
Regional lithostratigraphic units in the Triassic Montney Formation of western Canada
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, March 1, 2000; 48(1): 80 - 83.
[Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2010 by Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists